What is your opinions/ideas!
Auteur Message

What is your opinions/ideas!

8 messages
1 jeton

07 Août 2018 à 13:33

I think we may have a problem with the physical-biological coupling in terms of light. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
When SOLAR_SOURCE is defined, short wave radiation penetrates the water column and contributes to T. The decay penetration function is based on Jerlov's water type, which considers 2 radiation bands and has 2 absorption coefficients.

When including Fasham biology (I haven't checked other ecosystem models yet) shortwave is attenuated by water and chlorophyll, and the absorption coefficients are given as input in biofasham.in.

I believe that this brings mainly 2 problems:
1) attenuation is different for T and for P
2) light absorption by P doesn't feedback to the water column

I'm not sure whether this problem makes a big difference in the model results. I'll appreciate your opinions/ideas!

Please help.

I didn't find the right solution from the internet.

Marketing Explainer

Thank you.
Répondre à ce message


Communauté au top !

Vous devez être membre de digiSchool bac S

Pas encore inscrit ?

Ou identifiez-vous :

Mot de passe oublié ?